It depends on the angle you look at it. For example, political scientists often see the cause that

"Where the roots of the crisis of capitalism? During the seventies occurred in developed countries to what started despite increasing labor productivity to slow the growth of wages. Passed on labor-saving technologies, macey s so the bargaining position of workers is still weak, "says economist Ilona Švihlíková told the server Peníze.cz.
Economist Ilona Švihlíková is seen primarily as uncompromising critically Czech right. During our conversation, but flew harsh words and towards the left-wing parties. The difference between the right and left are said to be in the top Czech politics increasingly blurred, at least according to how they behave irrationally and express bipartisan parliamentary representatives from both sides of the political spectrum. "Even though I lean to the left and social issues are extremely important to me, promising people to high doses of a minimum wage without that we have a clear vision of where to direct our economy, I find it very unfortunate," says Ilona Švihlíková in our discussion siláckých statements of Czech politicians, afraid that even pre-election macey s TV debate will revolve mainly around the "wrongs of the past" and populist themes. To issues macey s related to the global economy, the debt crisis and the problems of the single monetary union, and quite soon we get back home. The speech then turns to the tax policy and the "crack down" on multinational corporations, the bungled macey s pension reform, combating Svarc system and the issues of food sovereignty is with us according to economists surveyed significantly underestimated.
Doc. Ing. Ilona Švihlíková, Ph.D. (* 1977) graduated from the University of Economics in Prague, majoring in international business and commercial languages. Received his doctorate in 2006 for a dissertation political aspects of globalization. He lectures at the College of International and Public Relations Prague, the head of the department of political, social and economic sciences. It focuses on international economic relations, various aspects of globalization, monetary issues, energy security and general connection between economics and politics (especially tax issues). In 2010 came her first book Globalization and crisis. macey s In 2011, completed the habilitation and won the title of associate professor. It is coordinator of the civil initiative Alternativa macey s bottom, which aims to support the community movement in the country. Since 2012, it is also one of the speakers alliance of labor and solidarity. I like to learn foreign languages, swimming, cycling, dancing and devoted to his mouratému cat.
Because changing the balance of power between labor and capital. You can see it on the indicator wage share, which compares the ratio of wages to GDP. It is simply how the total pie shared between wages and profits. When we look at the statistics, we can see that it was during macey s the seventies occurred in developed countries - Japan, starting and ending with the United States - to what began despite increasing labor productivity to slow the growth of wages. Since then, the capital began to take on the added value produced still more.
It depends on the angle you look at it. For example, political scientists often see the cause that in the seventies gradually moved from Keynesian economics to neo-liberal economics. Even though this is a very important ideological turnaround, I do not think that is the real root of it. For me it was more about the fact that post-war macey s reconstruction was completed and was gradually replaced labor-saving technologies. It will then necessarily have to show that the work was still weaker bargaining position.
Demographic glance tells us that when a region or civilization can not restore demographically, this is evidence that degenerates. A West has apparently not renew. From an economic point of view, the West fell into the trap of its high technological advancement is not in line with the economic system. But I'm not sure if it is correct, macey s we compared the West with Eastern macey s economies or BRIC countries [Brazil, macey s Russia, India, China - ed. eds.]. The latter are at a different stage of development, macey s solve other problems macey s have other options to catch up with developed countries. Can they watch while a number of inspiring aspects, each inspiration but the West can not be applied because it is simply somewhere else.
It is good to say that the only eurozone debt fighting. macey s About the only speaks the most, because macey s it is poorly done Monetary Union. Debt of Japan and the United States is much higher. About these states, but many do not speak, because they are monetarily sovereign. They have tools that indebted countries of the south wing of the euro area can not use. I think the problem lies in the euro area that is too asymmetrical, yet did not invent, and actually still refuses to devise a system in which it could operate along very different economy in the single currency area. Until the European macey s Union comes up with a mechanism that would allow it, so the move from the spot. Restrictive measures macey s because differences between countries even more deeper.
This is a complex question. Political elites way of the single monetary union much underestimated. Disputes